On Microeconomic Theory of Fertility
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A review of the microeconomic theory of fertility according to the tradition of Gary Becker is given in the text. The static model is presented in the first part, the dynamic in the second, and the third part deals with decision making within the family on the basis of the theory of games.
The microeconomic theory of fertility offers a contribution to the understanding of fertility in two ways: the first is the theoretical-methodological standpoint that birth is the outcome of decision making on the level of the individual, along with their maximizational behavior; the second is the involvement of economic variables among the factors which explain births.
Economists deeply believe that individualistic, rational and maximizational behavior of the individual is an imperative basis for considering human reactions and that it is a methodological approach which is superior to the alternative. This approach to social phenomena, without reducing complex motives of the individual (and family) to exclusively economic ones, finds a wide response in other social sciences, among them and in demography. Not only is the technical, formal elegancy and refined approach in question, but also strong insights into the real behavior of people.
On the other hand, the strength of the influences of economic factors on birth is always susceptible to discussions, just as any other empirical question. This influence certainly exists, and economists are, perhaps inclined to impute greater significance to it than what is realistic.
Downloads
Article Details
Published by the Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research
References
BECKER, G. S. (1965). "A Theory of Allocation of Time", Economic Journal, September/65.
BECKER, G. S. & H. G. LEWIS (1973). "On the Interaction Between Quantity and Quality of Children", Journal of Political Economy, 2, Part II, p. 280.
BECKER, G. S. (1991). A Treatise on the Family, (Harvard University Press), p. 138-139.
BERGSTROM, T. C. (1997). "A Survey of Theories of the Family", Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Volume 1A, North-Holland.
BURCH, T. K. (1995). "Icons, Strawmen and Precision: Some Reflections on Demographic Theory of Fertility Decline", The Sociological Quarterly, 37.
CALDWELL, J. (1976). "Toward a Restatement of Demographic Transition Theory", Population and Development Review, 2(4-4), pp. 321-366.
ESPENSHADE, T. (1977)."The Value and Cost of Children", Population Bulletin, 1/77, prema G. Becker (1991). A Treatise on the Family, (Harvard University Press), p. 140.
HAMMEL, E. A. (1995). "Economics 1, Culture 0, Fertility Change and Differences in the Northwest Balkans 1700-1900", u S. Greenhalgh (ed.) Situating Fertility: Anthropology and Demographic Inquiry, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
HAPPEL, S., J. HILL & S. LOW (1984)."An Economic Analysis of the Timing of Childbirth", Population Studies, 38, pp. 299-311.
HOBCRAFT, J. & K. KIERNAN (1995). "Becoming a Parent in Europe", European Population Conference, Milan, 4-8 September, 1995.
HOTZ, V. J., J. A. KLERMAN & R. J. WILLIS (1997). "The Economics of Fertility in Developed Countries", Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Volume 1A, North-Holland.
LEE, R. (1995). "History of Demography in the U.S. Since 1945", 50th Anniversary of INED, Paris, October 25-27, 1995.
LEIBENSTEIN, H. (1957). Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth, (New York: John Wiley and Sons).
LEIBENSTEIN, H. (1974). "An Interpretation the Economic Theory of Fertility: Promising Path or Blind Alley?", Journal of Economic Literature, June/74.
MCNICOLL, G. (1992). "The Agenda of Population Studies: A Commentary and Complaint", Population and Development Review, September, str. 403.
SIMON, J. (1974). The Effects of Income on Fertility, (Carolina Population Center).
SZAKADAT, L. (1998). "Children as Externalities", Ekonomska misao, 31(4), pp. 413-428.
WUNSCH, G. (1995). "Why Demographers Need Theory?", European population conference, Milan, 4-8 September 1995.