Biomedically Assisted Reproduction and Child Birth: Surrogate Motherhood in Comparative European Law and Serbia

Main Article Content

Gordana Kovaček Stanić

Abstract

Surrogate motherhood is an arrangement in which a woman agrees to carry and deliver a child for another couple who ordered the pregnancy. This procedure is applied today in Great Britain, Holland (although without legal regulations), Israel, Greece, Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, the USA and Australia, and it is forbidden in France, Austria, Spain, Germany, Switzerland and Slovenia. There are two types of surrogacy, one when the woman gives birth to a child who is genetically her own ("partial", genetic surrogacy), and the other where the surrogate mother only carries and gives birth to a child, whereby the child is genetically from the couple that wanted the child, or the fertilized egg is from a third woman (donor), or the embryo was donated ("full", "total", gestational surrogacy). In these cases two women take part in conception and birth of the child while in the last case there is a third woman who will raise the child. Biologically observed, the woman whose egg has been fertilized may be called the genetic mother, while the woman who carried the pregnancy and gave birth to the child – the gestational carrier. Taking into consideration that the Preliminary Draft of the Serbian Civil Law anticipates the introduction of surrogate motherhood into domestic law, we believe restrictive solutions should first be taken into consideration. This would mean that only full surrogating should be allowed, namely the egg should be from the woman who wants the child and not the surrogate mother. In domestic conditions, genetic surrogation should not be allowed as it leads to confusion in family relations, and kinships still have an important social and legal significance in our country. The surrogate mother should be a woman who has already given birth, because in that way any possible shocks which might arise after birth when the woman who has to handover the child to the intended couple would be avoided. The next condition would be that persons involved in this procedure should have usual residency in Serbia so as to prevent any international complications or problems. As far as compensation is concerned, only compensation of so-called reasonable expenses which the surrogate mother would incur should be allowed. The surrogate contract should be approved by a court judge, who would have the obligation to determine if all legal conditions have been fulfilled for surrogate motherhood, and to explain the contract effects to the contracting parties. Apart from that, psycho-social counselling of all persons involved in the procedure should be anticipated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kovaček Stanić, G. (2013). Biomedically Assisted Reproduction and Child Birth: Surrogate Motherhood in Comparative European Law and Serbia. Stanovnistvo, 51(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV1301001K
Section
Articles

References

BERNAT E., E. VRANES (1996). "The Austrian Act on Procreative Medicine: Scope, Impacts and Inconsistencies". U D. Evans (ed.) Creating the Child (Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).

CENTRE DE DROIT DE LA FAMILLE (2011). "Review of Family Law in 2010", U B. Atkin (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited).

CHAVES M. (2011). "Homoeffective Parentage in Relation to Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Parallel between Brazil and Portugal". U B. Atkin (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited).

CURRY-SUMNER I., M. VONK (2011). "National and International Surrogacy: An Odyssey". U B. Atkin (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited).

CURRY-SUMNER I., M. VONK (2012). "National and International Surrogacy: Something Old, Something New, Something International and Something Asked". U B. Atkin (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited).

DEECH R., A. SMAJDOR (2007). From IVF to Immortality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

DEUTSCH E. (1996). "Assisted Procreation in German Law". U D. Evans (ed.) Creating the Child (Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).

DRAŠKIĆ M. (1992). "Porodičnopravni aspekti artificijelne inseminacije", Anali Pravnog fakulteta, god. XLIII, br. 4, str. 239-264.

FORDER C. (1997). "An Undutchable Family Law: Partnership, Parenthood, Social Parenthood, Names and Some Article 8 ECHR Case Law". U A. Bainham (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Family Law).

FRANK R. (1997). "Parentage Law Reformed". U A. Bainham (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (The Hague, Boston, London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).

KHAZOVA O. (2000). "Three Years after Adoption of the New Russian Family Code". U A. Bainham (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Family Law).

KOUNOUGERI-MANOLEDAKI E. (2005). "Surrogate Motherhood in Greece (According to the New Law on Assisted Reproduction)". U A. Bainham (ed.). The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Family Law).

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (1997). Pravo deteta da zna svoje poreklo (Novi Sad: Centar za izdavačku delatnost Pravnog fakulteta).

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2001). "Porodično-pravni aspekti surogat materinstva". Pravni život, god. I-CLXXXIII br. 3.

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2006). "Porodični zakon Srbije iz 2005. godine u kontekstu planiranja porodice", Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke, br. 121, str. 157-170.

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2008). Legislativa o ljudskoj reprodukciji uz biomedicinsku pomoć (Novi Sad: Centar za izdavačku delatnost - Pravni fakultet), str. 211-221.

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2010). "Porodičnopravni aspekt biomedicinski potpomognutog oplođenja u pravu Srbije i evropskim pravima", Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke, br. 131, str. 415-430.

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2010). "Family Autonomy in Contemporary Parent-child Relations", The International Journal of Jurisprudence of the Family (IJJF) (Buffalo: William S. Hein & Co. Inc.), god I br. 1.

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2010). Porodično pravo: partnersko, dečje i starateljsko pravo (Novi Sad: Centar za izdavačku delatnost - Pravni fakultet).

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2011). "Autonomija versus materijalna istina u komparativnom pravu o porodičnom statusu deteta", Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, god. XLV, br. 3, str. 195-222.

KOVAČEK-STANIĆ G. (2011). "Pravo na biomedicinski potpomognuto začeće kao ljudsko pravo". U T. Miščević (ed.) Život i istraživanja, (Beograd: JP Službeni glasnik).

MACINTOSH K. L. (2005). Illegal Beings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

MORGAN, D., R.G. LEE, (1991). Blacstone’s Guide to the Human Fert¬ili¬sa¬tion and Embryology Act 1990 (London: Blackstone Press Limited), p. 153-154.

NIELSEN L., A. KRONBORG (1996). "Legislation on Assisted Reproduction, Reports on Adoption, the Family Principle and Blessing Registered Partnerships". U A. Bainham (ed.). The International Survey of Family Law (The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).

SALDEEN Å. (2004). "The Children Ombudsman, Adoption by Homosexual Partners and Assisted Reproduction". U A. Bainham (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers).

SCHULZ R. (1996). "The Right to Parenthood: Surrogacy and Frozen Embryos" . U A. Bainham (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (The Hague, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers), p. 239.

Surrogacy Arrangements Act 1985; Human Fertilisation and Embriology Act 1990; Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, 2008. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents, preuzeto 20. 10. 2013.

VIDAL MARTINEZ J. (1996). "The Legal Situation of Assisted Reproduction in Spain". U D. Evans (ed.). Creating the Child (Netherlands: Kluwer Law International).

WELSTEAD M. (2011). "Child is My Child: This Child is Your Child; This Child was made for You and Me – Surrogacy in England and Wales". U B. Atkin (ed.) The International Survey of Family Law (Bristol: Jordan Publishing Limited), p.167.