Union Formation and Partner Choice among Ex-Yugoslav Immigrants in Sweden

Main Article Content

Ognjen Obućina

Abstract

The mechanisms of exogamy and endogamy among immigrants are considered important indicators of social integration in the host society. The goal of this paper is to analyze the patterns of union formation among ex-Yugoslav of the first and second generation in Sweden. The study analyzes both marriages and non-marital childbearing unions. The longitudinal data (1990-2012) stem from the STAR compilation of the Swedish register data. The data cover the entire population residing in Sweden. The main analysis is based on discrete-time multinomial logistic regression. The results show that the length of stay in Sweden is positively associated with the likelihood of a union with a native Swedish person and negatively associated with the likelihood of an endogamous partner choice. A stronger exposure to ex-Yugoslav immigrants (measured as the share of ex-Yugoslavs in the municipality) implies a higher likelihood of endogamous union and a lower likelihood of a union with a native. University educated ex-Yugoslavs are the most likely to enter a union with a native, with the association being more pronounced among women. The patterns of intermarriage among ex-Yugoslavs largely resemble those identified in previous studies on native-immigrants marriages in Europe. One exception is that the propensity for endogamy is somewhat more pronounced among women. In order to obtain a more fine-grained picture of the causal mechanisms behind the results reported in this study, it will be necessary to conduct additional research, combining quantitative and qualitative methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Obućina, O. (2015). Union Formation and Partner Choice among Ex-Yugoslav Immigrants in Sweden. Stanovnistvo, 53(2), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV1502021O
Section
Articles

References

AMBROSO, G. (2006). The Balkans at a crossroads: Progress and challenges in finding durable solutions for refugees and displaced persons from the wars in the former Yugoslavia. New Issues in Refugee Research. Geneva: UNHCR (Research Paper 133).

ANDERSSON, G. & PHILIPOV, D. (2002). Life-table representations of family dynamics in Sweden, Hungary, and 14 other FFS countries: A project of descriptions of demographic behavior. Demographic Research 7 (4): 67–144.

ANDERSSON, G., OBUĆINA, O. & SCOTT, K. (2015). Marriage and divorce of immigrants and descendants to immigrants in Sweden. Demographic Research 33(3): 31–64.

BLAU, P. M., BLUM, T. C. & SCHWARTZ, J. E. (1982). Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review 47(1): 45–62.

BLAU, P. M., BEEKER, C. & FITZPATRICK, K. M. (1984). Intersecting social affiliations and intermarriage. Social Forces 62(3): 585–606.

BONIFAZI, C. & MAMOLO, M. (2004). Past and current trends of Balkan migra-tions. Espace Populations Sociétés. Space Populations Societies 3: 519–531.

BOTEV, N. (1994). Where East meets West: Ethnic intermarriage in the former Yugoslavia, 1962 to 1989. American Sociological Review 59(3): 461–480.

CASTLES, S., DE HAAS, H. & MILLER, M. J. (2014). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

CHOI, K. H., TIENDA, M., COBB-CLARK, D. & SINNING, M. (2012). Immigration and status exchange in Australia and the United states. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 30(1): 49–62.

COLEMAN, D. A. (1994). Trends in fertility and intermarriage among immigrant populations in Western Europe as measures of integration. Journal of Biosocial Science 26 (01): 107–136.

DRIBE, M. & LUNDH, C. (2008). Intermarriage and immigrant integration in Sweden an exploratory analysis. Acta Sociologica 51(4): 329–354.

DRIBE, M. & LUNDH, C. (2011). Cultural dissimilarity and intermarriage. A longitudinal study of immigrants in Sweden 1990–20051. International Migration Review 45(2): 297–324.

DRIBE, M. & LUNDH, C. (2012). Intermarriage, value context and union dissolution: Sweden 1990–2005. European Journal of Population 28(2): 139-158.

DUVANDER, A. E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage. A longitudinal study of the propensity to marry in Sweden in the early 1990s. Journal of Family Issues 20(5): 698–717.

FURTADO, D. & THEODOROPOULOS, N. (2011). Interethnic marriage: A choice between ethnic and educational similarities. Journal of Population Economics 24(4): 1257–1279.

GONZALEZ-FERRER, A. (2006). Who do immigrants marry? Partner choice among single immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review 22(2): 171–185.

GORDON, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion and national origins. Oxford University Press.

GREČIĆ, V. (2002). The role of migrant professionals in the process of transition in Yugoslavia. Međunarodni problemi 54(3): 253–271.

HOLLAND, J. A. (2013). Love, marriage, then the baby carriage? Marriage timing and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research 29 (11): 275–306.

KALMIJN, M. (1993). Trends in black/white intermarriage. Social Forces 72(1): 119–146.

KALMIJN, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395–421.

KALMIJN, M. & FLAP, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces 79(4): 1289–1312.

KALMIJN, M. & VAN TUBERGEN, F. (2006). Ethnic intermarriage in the Netherlands: Confirmations and refutations of accepted insights. European Journal of Population 22(4): 371–397.

KOGAN, I. (2003). Ex-Yugoslavs in the Austrian and Swedish labour markets: The significance of the period of migration and the effect of citizenship acquisition. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 29(4): 595-622.

KULU, H. & GONZÁLEZ-FERRER, A. (2014). Family dynamics among immigrants and their descendants in Europe: Current research and opportunities. European Journal of Population 30(4): 411–435.

KUPISZEWSKI, M., KUPISZEWSKA, D. & NIKITOVIĆ, V. (2012). The impact of demographic and migration flows on Serbia. Belgrade: International Organization for Migration, Mission to Serbia.

LANZIERI, G. (2012). Merging populations: A look at marriages with foreign-born persons in European countries. Luxembourg: Eurostat (Statistics in focus 29/2012).

ISS (2013). Dynamic historical analysis of longer term migratory, labour market and human capital processes in Serbia. Country report developed within the project "SEEMIG Managing Migration and Its Effects–Transnational Actions Towards Evidence Based Strategies". Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences.

MARE, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review 56 (1): 15–32.

MUTTARAK, R. & HEATH, A. (2010). Who intermarries in Britain? Explaining ethnic diversity in intermarriage patterns. The British Journal of Sociology 61(2): 275–305.

OECD (2015). Connecting with emigrants – a global profile of diasporas 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.

PAVLOV, T. (2009). Migration potential of Serbia. Belgrade: Group 484.

QIAN, Z. & Lichter, D. T. (2001). Measuring marital assimilation: Intermarriage among natives and immigrants. Social Science Research 30(2): 289–312.

SAFI, M. (2010). Patterns of immigrant intermarriage in France: Intergene-rational marital assimilation? Zeitschrift Für Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research 22(1): 89‒108.

ŠANTRIĆ-MILIĆEVIĆ, M. M., TERZIĆ-ŠUPIĆ, Z. J., MATEJIĆ, B. R., VASIĆ, V. & RICKETTS, T. C. (2014). First-and fifth-year medical students’ intention for emigration and practice abroad: A case study of Serbia. Health Policy 118(2): 173–183.

SCB (2015). Statistics Sweden, population statistics. Online access. http://www.scb.se.

SCHIERUP, C. (1995). Former Yugoslavia: Long waves of international migration. In R.Cohen (ed.), The Cambridge Survey of World Migration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SHERKAT, D. E. (2004). Religious intermarriage in the United States: Trends, patterns, and predictors. Social Science Research 33(4): 606–625.

SMITS, J. (2010). Ethnic intermarriage and social cohesion. What can we learn from Yugoslavia? Social Indicators Research 96(3): 417–432.

SONG, M. (2009). Is intermarriage a good indicator of integration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 35(2): 331–348.

Van TUBERGEN, F. & MAAS, I. (2007). Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants in the Netherlands: An analysis of population data. Social Science Research 36 (3): 1065–1086.

VIDOVIC, H. & MARA, I. (2015). Free movement of workers, transitional arrangements and potential mobility from Croatia. Vienna: WIIW–The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (Research Report 402).

VIKAT, A., THOMSON, E. & HOEM, J. M. (1999). Stepfamily fertility in contemporary Sweden: The impact of childbearing before the current union. Population Studies 53 (2): 211–225.