Digital Social Participation of Young People in Serbia: Between Symbolic Support and Civic Engagement
Glavni sadržaj članka
Apstrakt
Contemporary youth participation increasingly occurs in digital environments, yet it remains unclear whether such practices amount to mere symbolic support or constitute an emerging form of civic engagement. This article examines the forms, motives, barriers, and mobilisation potential of digital social participation among young people in Serbia. The study is based on an exploratory triangulation design that combines a survey of 100 young respondents aged 16 to 24, 12 semi-structured interviews, and a coded content analysis of 500 social media posts. The findings show that young people use the internet and social networks intensively and that they follow social and political content regularly or occasionally. However, their engagement most often takes low-threshold forms, including sharing activist content, signing online petitions, commenting, and occasionally expressing personal views publicly. At the same time, the interviews reveal that young people do not uniformly understand digital activism: some perceive it as a contemporary public space and a first step towards broader civic engagement, while others see it as a limited, superficial, or insufficiently effective form of support. The content analysis indicates that education, politics, and human rights are the most visible topics, whereas video posts, calls to action, and emotionally framed content have the strongest potential to generate reactions. The article concludes that digital social participation among young people is neither a substitute for traditional civic engagement nor a mere illusion of action. Rather, it is a transitional and generationally specific form of participation whose effects are strengthened when connected with education, community support, clear objectives, and offline action.
Puni tekst članka je dostupan za ovaj lokalitet: English.
Detalji članka
Centar za demografska istraživanja Instituta društvenih nauka
Reference
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. https://www.danah.org/books/ItsComplicated.pdf
Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means?. First Monday, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015103.001.0001
Eurostat. (2025). 97% of young people in the EU use the internet daily. Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/edn-20250715-1
Jugović, A. L., & Živaljević, D. V. (2021). Notional and conceptual approaches to radicalization as a process of violent extremism development. Sociološki Pregled, 55(2), 436-457. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg55-31516
Kahne, J., Lee, N.-J., & Feezell, J. T. (2013). The civic and political significance of online participatory cultures among youth transitioning to adulthood. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.701109
Kristofferson, K., White, K., & Peloza, J. (2014). The nature of slacktivism: How the social observability of an initial act of token support affects subsequent prosocial action. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1149-1166. https://doi.org/10.1086/674137
Mandić, S., & Vinokić, M. (2025). Political culture among the youth in Serbia: Interest, participation, satisfaction and trust. Stanovništvo, 63(2), 413-446. https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.683
Milašinović, S., & Milojević, S. (2016). Designing and conducting scientific research. Academy of Criminalistic and Police Studies.
Milojević, S., Milašinović, S., & Gligorijević, M. (2025). Methodology. Part 1: Epistemological-logical foundations. Alpha BK University. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_jakov_2041
Milojević, S., Milašinović, S., & Milojković, B. (2025b). Police and science: Towards the development of academic discipline in the service of public safety. Diplomacy and Security, 8(1), 7-73. https://doi.org/10.5937/DB2501007M
Milojević, S., Milašinović, S., & Milojković, B. (2025a). Police science in the 21st century: Building theoretical and methodological foundations. Teme, 49(2), 421-439. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME250207028M
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs.
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. (2026). Usage ICT – individuals. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. https://www.stat.gov.rs/en-us/oblasti/upotreba-ikt/upotreba-ikt-pojedinci/
Stojanović, B., Ivković, A., & Kaličanin, B. (2025). Alternative report on the position and needs of youth in the Republic of Serbia – 2025. National Youth Council of Serbia (KOMS). https://koms.rs/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Alternativni-izvestaj-2025.pdf
Theocharis, Y. (2015). The conceptualisation of digitally networked participation. Social Media + Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610140
UNICEF Serbia. (2026). Participation and engagement. UNICEF Serbia. https://www.unicef.org/serbia/en/participation-and-engagement
Živaljević, D. (2022). Radicalisation of society and terrorism. National Security Academy.