Relationship between Gender equality in household labor, Marital stability and quality

Main Article Content

Jelena Šakotić-Kurbalija
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-131X
Dragan Kurbalija
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2520-1828
Nikolina Kukulj
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8602-5783

Abstract

The main goal of this research was to examine how important the gender equality in the distribution of household labor is for marital stability and the perception of marital quality. The study included 498 couples from the Republic of Serbia who lived together for a period ranging from 6 months to 57 years and 6 months (M= 14.02, SD= 11.85). The data was collected during 2015 and 2016 as part of a broader research project. Both partners provided responses on the household labor workload, satisfaction with the division of housework, dimensions of marital quality (Dyadic consensus, Dyadic satisfaction, Affectional expression and Dyadic cohesion) and the degree of marital instability. Differences in the household labor workload between women and men were examined using a series of t-tests for dependent samples. The structure of differences between couples who perform housework equally and those in which one spouse mainly performs the majority of work in the degree of satisfaction with the division of housework, assessment of the marital quality and stability was examined using discriminant analysis. The results indicate that the traditional division of household labor is still present in our society and that women are more engaged in housework related to feeding and hygiene, while husbands are more engaged in repair work. Caring for the children, pets, garden and lawn, are household tasks that both spouses are equally engaged in. The results also indicate that an equal distribution of household labor is important for women's satisfaction with the division of housework, and also for the degree of dyadic cohesion and dyadic satisfaction of both spouses. Based on the results, we can assume the existence of different mechanisms that connect the division of household labor, satisfaction with the division of housework, and the quality and stability of the relationship in men and women. The factors that influence satisfaction with the division of household labor in men should be further investigated, since they are not determined by the spouse's actual engagement in the housework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Šakotić-Kurbalija, J., Kurbalija, D., & Kukulj, N. (2025). Relationship between Gender equality in household labor, Marital stability and quality. Stanovnistvo. https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.704
Section
Thematic issue "Population, Gender Equality, and Public Policies"
Author Biographies

Jelena Šakotić-Kurbalija, Odsek za psihologiju, fakultet za Filozofiju, Univerzitet Novi Sad, Srbija

Full professor

Dragan Kurbalija, Agricultural High School with Dormitory Futog, Serbia

Professional associate - psychologist at the student dormitory

Nikolina Kukulj, Elementary School „Jovan Sterija Popović“, Vršac, Serbia

Master psychologist

References

Barnett, R. C. (2004). Women and Multiple Roles: Myths and reality. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12 (3), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220490472418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10673220490472418

Bartley, S. J.; Blanton, P. W. and Gilliard, J. L. (2005). Husbands and Wives in Dual-Earner Marriages: Decision-Making, Gender Role Attitudes, Division of Household Labor and Equity. Marriage & Family Review, 37 (4), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v37n04_05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v37n04_05

Bartolac, A. i Kamenov, Ž. (2013). Perceived Distribution of Family Obligations Between Partners and Perception of Equity in a Relationship. Sociologija i prostor, 51 (1 (195)), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.51.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.51.1.4

Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer L. C. and Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labor. Social Forces, 79(1),191-228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2675569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2675569

Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A. & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who Did, Does or Will Do It, and How Much Does It Matter?. Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120

Blair, S. L., & Johnson, M. P. (1992). Wife’s perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(3),570-581. https://doi.org/10.2307/353243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353243

Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring Martial Instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(2), 387-393. https://doi.org/10.2307/351516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/351516

Carlson, D.L. (2022). Reconceptualizing the Gendered Division of Housework: Number of Shared Tasks and Partners’ Relationship Quality. Sex Roles 86, 528–543 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01282-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01282-5

Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., & Rudd, S. (2020). Division of Housework, Communication, and Couples’ Relationship Satisfaction. Socius, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120924805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023120924805

Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., & Sassler, S. (2018). Stalled for Whom? Change in the Division of Particular Housework Tasks and Their Consequences for Middle- to Low-Income Couples. Socius 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118765867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118765867

Carlson, D. L., Miller, A. J., Sassler, S. & Hanson, S. (2016). The Gendered Division of Housework and Couples’ Sexual Relationships: A Reexamination. Journal of Marriage and Family 78(4):975–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12313

Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on Household Labor: Modeling and Measuring the Social Embeddedness of Routine Family Work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01208.x

Coltrane, S. and Shih, K. Y. (2010). Gender and the division of labor, in: J. C. Chrisler and D. R. McCreary (Eds.). Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_17

Čudina-Obradović, M. i Obradović, J. (2006). Psihologija braka i obitelji. Zagreb: Golden Marketing – Tehnička knjiga.

Daminger, A. (2019). The Cognitive Dimension of Household Labor. American Sociological Review, 84(4), 609-633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419859007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419859007

DeVault, M. L. (1999). Comfort and Struggle: Emotion Work in Family Life. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716299561001004

Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure. American Journal of Socio-logy, 85(3), 551–75. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227049

Kamenov, Ž., Jelić, M., Tadinac, M., & Hromatko, I. (2007). Quality and stability of the relationship as a function of distribution of housework, financial investments, and decision making between partners. 15th Psychology Days in Zadar⎯Book of Selected Proceedings. Zadar: University of Zadar.

Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M., & Van de Vliert, E. (1996). Marital conflict about the division of house-hold labor and paid work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(4), 958–969. https://doi.org/10.2307/353983 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/353983

Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2002). Divison of labor, perceived fairness, and marital quality: The effect of gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00027.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00027.x

Lynch, J. M., & Reilly, M. E. (1998). Power sharing in lesbian partnerships. In C. M. Davis, W. L. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp.396-401). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., Nomaguchi, K., & Yan, H. X. (2025). Who’s Doing the Housework and Childca-re in America Now? Differential Convergence in Twenty-First-Century Gender Gaps in Home Tasks. Socius, 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231251314667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231251314667

Petrović, J., Mihić, I., Zotović, M., i Kapor-Stanulović, N. (2009). Porodične uloge oca i majke u porodi-cama u procesu tranzicije. Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke, 128, 31-45. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN0928031P DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN0928031P

Rogers, S. J. and Amato, P. R. (2000). Have Changes in Gender Relations Affected Marital Quality?. Social Forces, 79 (2), 731-753. https://doi.org/10.2307/2675515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2675515

Ruppanner, L. (2008). Fairness and Housework: A Cross-National Comparison. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39 (4), 509-526. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.39.4.509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.39.4.509

Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.299

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/350547

Tadinac, M., Kamenov, Ž., Jelić M., & Hromatko, I. (2005). Što ljubavnu vezu čini uspješnom? Ljetna psihologijska škola studenata i nastavnika. Odsjek za psihologiju, Filozofski fakultet. Zagreb.

Terman, L.M., Buttenwieser, P., Ferguson, L.W., Johnson, W.B., & Wilson, D.P. (1938). Psychological factors in Marital Happiness. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Wilcox, W. B., & Nock, S. L. (2006). What's love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women's marital quality. Social Forces, 84(3), 1321-1345. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0076