Political participation and life course transitions among young people in Europe

Main Article Content

Dragan Stanojević
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-2461
Anja Gvozdanović
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1213-5928

Abstract

The subject of this article is the analysis of the relationship between the life course of young people and political participation in Europe. Results show that young people’s transitions in education, work, and family in European countries are directly associated with institutional and non-institutional forms of political participation. Entering new roles and obtaining or losing resources (financial, social, or time) forms a more or less stimulating context for involvement in the political field.


The analysis shows that our first hypothesis proved to be correct. Both institutional and non-institutional forms of participation are positively associated with the study experience, and this indicator is the most consistent predictor of both forms of participation. Young people who go through higher education better understand the socio-political context and have more knowledge of how they can influence social processes. The transition to the labour market also shows positive associations with political participation, but only with certain practices, so our hypothesis is only partially correct. Young people who work vote more often, are active within parties, contact political representatives, and are active within NGOs. Work provides more financial and social capital, as well as the acquisition of new skills and competencies that are important for engagement. Employment seems to lead to a rationalisation of time and a better understanding of the effects of engagement. The third hypothesis also proved to be (almost) correct, as half of institutional and all non-institutional forms of participation are negatively associated with parenthood. Entering the parental role leads to a certain repackaging of priorities, and the lack of available time reduces the probability of participation. The fourth hypothesis was (partially) confirmed. With the growth of democracy within society, young people are more willing to participate in almost all forms of non-institutional practices (except for demonstrations) and to contact politicians and participate in campaigns more often. A high degree of organisation of political infrastructure and a democratic political culture represent a prerequisite for the existence of democratic practices.


The hypotheses with which we examined the associations between context, life events, and participation generally did not prove to be justified. Although the highly educated in democratic societies vote more often and join parties (and similar groups), they participate less often in campaigns and are involved in all non-institutional forms of participation at the same level as those in less democratic societies. The explanation for the lack of differences between old and new democracies in the level of non-institutional participation of the highly educated may lie in the same role played by university education. In both developed and less developed democracies, those who establish or preserve these practices are students, who are both the most open to news and the most sensitive to social injustices.


The relationship between work and activism was completely the opposite of what was expected. Given that work represents a source of resources (economic and social capital), we expected that in more democratic societies, which are also more economically developed, this connection would be stronger, but it is actually weaker. The explanation for this phenomenon may lie in the dependence of the sphere of work on the political field in "new democracies". The latter is dominated by clientelistic relations, where a significant number of young people who enter the labour market do so through political channels and in turn have to be active in political parties, especially during election campaigns.


The last hypothesis proved to be correct, as context did not moderate the relationship between parenting and participation. Entering the parental role is equally challenging for young people regardless of their location or social and political context, and on average it certainly leads to a lower level of participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Stanojević, D., & Gvozdanović, A. (2022). Political participation and life course transitions among young people in Europe. Stanovnistvo, 60(2), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV2202049S
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Dragan Stanojević, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Assistant Professor

Anja Gvozdanović, Institute for Social Research in Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Senior Research Associate

References

Ahearn, C. E., Brand, J. E., & Zhou, X. (2022). How, and For Whom, Does Higher Education Increase Voting? Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-022-09717-4

Blais, A. (2007). Turnout in elections. In R. J. Dalton & H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 621–635). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bliznakovski, J., Stanojević, D., Petrović, P., Piacentini, A., Drishti, E., Kopliku Dema, B., … Luli, E. (2020). Political Clientelism in the Western Balkans Collection of Papers. Skopje: Institute for Sociological, Political and Judicial Research, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. https://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/8095/bitstream_8095.pdf

Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American political science review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425

Dalton, R. (1996). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Chatham: Chatham House.

Erkulwater, J. L. (2012). Political Participation over the Life Cycle. In K. L. Schlozman, S. Verba & H. E. Brady (Eds.), The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy (pp. 199–231). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (2012). Social change and political engagement among young people: generation and the 2009/2010 British Election Survey. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr045

García-Albacete, G. M. (2013). Life-cycle and political participation: Do young people participate differently due to the life stage in which they are? Working Papers Online Series (Working Paper 146/2013). Retrieved from https://www.uam.es/Derecho/documento/1242668707880/Working_Paper_146__2013_Gema_Garc_a.pdf?blobheader=application/pdf

Giugni, M., Lorenzini, J., Cinalli, M., Lahusen, C., & Baglioni, S. (2021). Young People and Long-term Unemployment: Personal, Social, and Political Effects. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003120421

Henn, M., & Foard, N. (2014). Social differentiation in young people’s political participation: the impact of social and educational factors on youth political engagement in Britain. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.830704

Hooghe, M., & Wilkenfeld, B. (2008). The stability of political attitudes and behaviors across adolescence and early adulthood: A comparison of survey data on adolescents and young adults in eight countries. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9199-x

Ilišin, V., & Spajić Vrkaš, V. (Ur.) (2017). Generacija osujećenih: mladi u Hrvatskoj na početku 21. stoljeća. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja.

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Lavrič, M., Tomanović, S., & Jusić, M. (2019). Youth study southeast Europe 2018/2019. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

Levine, P. (2007). The future of democracy: Developing the next generation of American citizens. Hanover: University Press of New England.

Lorenzini, J., & Giugni, M. (2012). Employment status, social capital, and political participation: A comparison of unemployed and employed youth in Geneva. Swiss Political Science Review, 18(3), 332–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1662-6370.2012.02076.x

Macedo, S., Alex-Assensoh, Y., Berry, J. M., Brintnall, M., Campbell, D. E., Fraga, L. R., … Walsh, K. C. (2005). Democracy at risk: how political choices undermine citizen participation, and what we can do about it. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt12879p5

Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (2003). Young people and political activism: from the politics of loyalties to the politics of choice? Paper presented at the Council of Europe symposium entitled “Young people and democratic institutions: from disillusionment to participation”, Strasbourg, 27-28 November.

Pilkington, H., & Pollock G. (2015). ‘Politics are bollocks’: youth, politics and activism in contemporary Europe. The Sociological Review, 63(S2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12260

Quaranta, M. (2016). Life course, gender, and participation in voluntary organizations in Italy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 874–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9615-x

Sartori, L., Tuorto, D., & Ghigi, R. (2017). The social roots of the gender gap in political participation: The role of situational and cultural constraints in Italy. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 24(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxx008

Stanojević, D., & Petrović, J. (2020). “The Balkan Paradox” Young People in Conventional Politics: Between Ideals and Instrumental Goals. In International Scientific Conference “Political Clientelism in the Western Balkans” Collection of Papers (pp.13-36). Skopje: Institute for Sociological, Political and Judicial Research, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje. https://reff.f.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/8095/bitstream_8095.pdf

The Economist (2021). Democracy index 2020: in sickness and in health? Report by the Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2020/

The European Social Survey (2020). ESS9-2018: Data file edition 3.1. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC. http://dx.doi.org/10.21338/NSD-ESS9-2018

Šalaj, B. (2011). Politička pismenost mladih u Hrvatskoj: teorija i istraživanje. In D. Bagić (Eds.), Odgaja li škola dobre građane? Studija o političkoj socijalizaciji hrvatskih srednjoškolaca (pp. 7–23). Zagreb: GONG.

Wolfinger, N. H., & Wolfinger, R. E. (2008). Family structure and voter turnout. Social forces, 86(4), 1513–1528. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0031

Most read articles by the same author(s)