Between Integration, Security and Humanitarianism: Serbian Citizens’ Attitudes towards Migrants
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Almost a million people from Middle East and North Africa have passed through the territory of Serbia on their way to Western Europe during 2015 and 2016. Although Serbia has predominantly been a transit country for migrants, this recent passage of a large number of people, as well as a longer retention of some migrants, opened up a number of questions on capacities for emergent acceptance but also on long term integration of this population.
The paper examines the characteristics of citizens’ attitudes towards the migrant population with the intention of determining which perspective – security, humanitarian or integrative – is being distinguished as a dominant one? Under the security perspective, it is understood that migrants pose a potential risk for the security of domestic population. The humanitarian perspective refers to a belief that migrants need to be provided with necessary assistance on their way to destination countries. The third, integrative perspective represents the “most open” attitude towards migrants and implies that it is necessary to provide the opportunity for more permanent integration of the migrant population. In addition to that, the paper examines the existence of statistically significant variations in the degree of acceptance of the attitudes measuring mentioned perspectives in terms of socio-demographic and socio-cultural factors.
The analysis is based on the data collected through the survey conducted in the spring of 2016 on a representative sample of Serbian citizens (without Kosovo) that numbered 998 respondents. Findings show that the humanitarian perspective is the most prevalent in the population, which is in line with the transitional character of migration. Ethnic distance is the most influential factor in shaping attitudes towards migrants. This finding indicates that attitudes toward migrants are more the result of the socio-psychological factors than the micro-structural factors or the demographic and cultural characteristics. Furthermore, this finding points to the deeper historical roots of factors shaping the examined perspectives, but also indicates the directions of potential positive action through the breaking of negative stereotypes and formulation of adequate strategies for the promotion of multicultural societies.
Downloads
Article Details
Published by the Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research
References
ADAMSON, F. B. (2006). Crossing Borders: International Migration and National Security. International Security 31(1): 165–199. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4137542
ALLPORT, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
ANTHIAS, F., & PAJNIK, М. (eds.). (2014). Contesting Integration, Engendering Migration. Theory and Practice. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137294005
ARONSON, E., VILSON, T., & AKERT, R. M. (2013). Socijalna psihologija. Beograd: Mate.
BARNETT, M., & WEISS, Т. G. (2008). Humanitarianism: A Brief History of the Present. In М. Barnett & T. G. Weiss (eds.), Humanitarianism in Question: Power, Politics, Ethics (pp. 1–48). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
BERG, E., & BESHAROV, D. (2016). Patterns of Global Migration. In: D. J. Besharov & M. H. Lopez (eds.), Adjusting to a World in Motion – Trends in Global Migration and Migration Policy (pp. 58–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BESHAROV, D. J., & LOPEZ, M. H. (eds.). (2016) Adjusting to a World in Motion – Trends in Global Migration and Migration Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BOBIĆ, M. (2013). Imigracija u Srbiji: Stanje i perspektive, tolerancija i integracija. Demografija 10: 99–115. http://www.gef.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/Demografija10.pdf
BOBIĆ, M., & BABOVIĆ, M. (2013). Međunarodne migracije u Srbiji – stanje i politike. Sociologija 55(2): 209–228. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1302209B
BREWER, M. B., & BROWN, R. J. (1998). Intergroup Relations. In: D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4th ed. Vol. 2, pp. 554–594). New York: McGraw-Hill.
CARD, D., DUSTMANN, C., & PRESTON, I. (2005). Understanding attitudes to immigration: The migration and minority module of the first European Social Survey. London: Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration, Department of Economics, University College London (CReAM Discussion Paper 03/05). http://davidcard.berkeley.edu/papers/euroimmig.pdf
CASTLES, S., & MILLER, M. J. (2009). The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modern World (4th ed.). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.age-of-migration.com/4e/index.asp
CHANDLER, C. R., & TSAI, Y. (2001). Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: an analysis of data from the General Social Survey. The Social Science Journal 38(2): 177– 188. DOI: 10.1016/S0362-3319(01)00106-9
DANIELS, J. P., & VON DER RUHR, M. (2005). God and the Global Economy: Attitudes toward Trade and Immigration in the United States. Socio-economic Review 3(3): 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/SER/mwi020
DUSTMANN, C., & PRESTON, I. (2004). Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration. London: Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration, Department of Economics, University College London (CReAM Discussion Paper 01/04). http://www.cream-migration.org/publ_uploads/CDP_01_04.pdf
DUVELL, F., MOLODIKOVA, I., & COLLYER, M. (eds.) (2014). Transit Migration in Europe. IMISCOE Research. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
ESIPOVA, N., & RAY, J. (2009). 700 Million Worldwide Desire to Migrate Permanently: U.S. Tops Desired Destination Countries (electronic resource). Washington, DC: Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/124028/700-Million-Worldwide-Desire-Migrate-Permanently.aspx
FEKETE, L. (2009). A Suitable Enemy: Racism, Migration and Islamophobia in Europe. London: Pluto Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt183p2jr
FRONTEX (2016). Risk Analysis for 2016. Warsaw: Frontex. DOI:10.2819/26690
GABIAM, N. (2016). Humanitarianism, Development and Security in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Syrian Refugee Crisis. International Journal of Middle East Studies 48(2): 382–386. DOI: 10.1017/S0020743816000131
HAINMUELLER, J., & HISCOX, M. J. (2007). Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes Toward Immigration in Europe. International Organization 61(2): 399–442. DOI: 10+10170S0020818307070142
HERNES, G., & KNUDSEN, K. (1992). Norwegians attitudes toward new immigrants. Acta Sociologica 35(2): 123–139. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4194763
HERZOG, B. (2009). Between nationalism and humanitarianism: the glocal discourse on refugees. Nations and Nationalism 15(2): 185–205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2009.00380.x
KONTOS, M. (2014). Restrictive Integration Policies and the Construction of the Migrant as ‘Unwilling to Integrate’: The Case of Germany. In: F. Anthias & M. Pajnik (eds.), Contesting Inte gration, Engendering Migration. Theory and Practice (pp. 125–142). Houndmils: Palgrave Macmilan.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137294005_7
KYMLICKA, W. (2007). The new debate on minority rights (and postscript). In A. S. Laden & D. Owen (eds.), Multiculturalism and Political Theory (pp. 25–59). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KYMLICKA, W. (2012). Multiculturalism: Success, Failure, and the Future. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TCM-Multiculturalism-Web.pdf
LEONG, C-H., & WARD, C. (2006). Cultural values and attitudes toward immigrants and multiculturalism: The case of the Eurobarometer survey on racism and xenophobia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 30(6): 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.07.001
MAYDA, A. M. (2004). Who Is Against Immigration? A Cross-country Investigation of Individual Attitudes towards Immigrants. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA Discussion Papers 1115). http://ftp.iza.org/dp1115.pdf
OTTAVIANO, G., & PERI, G. (2006). The economic value of cultural diversity: evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography 6(1): 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi002
PAAS, T., & HALAPUU, V. (2012). Attitudes towards immigrants and the integration of ethnically diverse societies. London: NORFACE Research Programme on Migration, Department of Economics, University College London (Discussion Paper 2012-23). http://www.norface-migration.org/publ_uploads/NDP_23_12.pdf
PAPADOPOULOU-KOURKOULA, A. (2008). Transit Migration – The Missing Link between Emigration and Settlement. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230583801
PERRUCHOUD, R., & REDPATH-CROSS, J. (eds.) (2011). Glossary on Migration (2nd ed.). International Migration Law Series No. 25. Geneva: International Organization for Migration (IOM). https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/iml25_1.pdf
PETTIGREW, T. F., & TROPP, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(5): 751–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
POPADIĆ, D. (2010). Put iz bratstva i jedinstva – etničke distance građana Srbije. U S. Mihailović (ur.), Kako građani Srbije vide tranziciju: istraživanje javnog mnjenja tranzicije (str. 106−120). Beograd: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
QUILLIAN, L. (1995). Prejudice as A Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review 60(4): 586–612. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096296
SCHLUETER, E., & WAGNER, U. (2008). Regional Differences Matter: Examining the Dual Influence of the Regional Size of the Immigrant Population on Derogation of Immigrants in Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49(2–3): 153–173. DOI: 10.1177/0020815207088910
SORENSEN, N. N. (2006). Mediterranean Transit Migration and Development: Experience and Policy Options. In N. Sorensen (ed.), Mediterranean Transit Migration (pp. 5–23). Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
STEPHAN, W. G., & RENFRO, C. L. (2002). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In: D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). New York and Hove: Psychology Press.
TAJFEL, H., & TURNER, J. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterrey, CA: Brooks/Cole. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226768898_An_Integrative_Theory_of_Intergroup_Conflict
TRIMIKLINIOTIS, N. (2007). Populism, Democracy and Social Citizenship: Discourses on “Illegal Migration” or Beyond the “Fortress” versus “Cosmopolitanism” Debate. In E. Berggren, B. Likić-Brborić, G. Toksöz & N. Trimikliniotis (eds.), Irregular Migration, Informal Labour and Community: A Challenge for Europe (pp. 351–371). Maastricht: Shaker. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303600005_Irregular_Migration_Informal_Labour_and_Community_A_Challenge_for_Europe
VAN OORSCHOT, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706059829
VULETIĆ, V., STANOJEVIĆ, D., VUKELIĆ, J., & PEŠIĆ, J. (2016). Studija o izbeglicama – Srbija 2016. Beograd: Fondacija Fridrih Ebert/Centar za primenjena društvena istraživanja. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/belgrad/12929.pdf
WILSON, T. C. (1991). Urbanism, Migration, and Tolerance: A Reassessment. American Sociological Review 56(1):117–123. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095677
ZAICEVA, A., & ZIMMERMANN, K. (2014). Migration and the Demographic Shift. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA Discussion Paper 8743). http://ftp.iza.org/dp8743.pdf