Institutional Context and Generational Divisions among Bosniaks

Main Article Content

PhD Jasmin Hodžić
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9346-8186
PhD Uroš Kandić
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3756-8983

Abstract

The study analyses generational divisions in value orientations and political preferences among Bosniaks in three post-Yugoslav states (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and Montenegro). The aim is to determine whether contextual factors (institutional status and ethnopolitical mobilisation) shape the strength and manifestation of generational differences. Using a sample of 800 respondents and applying the PAPI method in 2022, the analysis tests hypotheses on the effects of formative experiences (the SFRY generation, the transitional generation, and the post-war generation) on religiosity, authoritarian traditionalism, economic orientations, and political preferences. The results indicate that contextual factors exert a stronger influence than generational affiliation itself. The country accounts for 7.7% of the variance in religiosity, whereas generation explains 3.4%. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bosniaks display the most pronounced generational divisions, alongside a paradox in which the post-war generation is the most religious while simultaneously favouring civic-secular parties. In Serbia, the analysis identifies generational homogeneity, neutralised by reactive ethnicity. Montenegro represents the most complex constellation, where generational divisions overlap with an identity-nomination cleavage (Bosniak versus Muslim). The findings confirm Mannheim’s theory of formative experiences in Montenegro, partially support it in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and challenge it in Serbia, demonstrating that institutional context substantially shapes generational effects.

Full-text of the article is available for this locale: Srpski.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hodžić, J., & Kandić, U. (2026). Institutional Context and Generational Divisions among Bosniaks. Stanovnistvo. https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.742
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

PhD Jasmin Hodžić, Ministry of Education, Belgrade, Serbia

PhD in Political Science

PhD Uroš Kandić, Ministry of Tourism and Youth, Belgrade, Serbia

PhD in Political Science

References

Berger, P. L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion. Doubleday.

Bešić, M. (2014). Vrednosne orijentacije u bivšoj Jugoslaviji. Sociološki Pregled, 48(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg1401017B DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg1401017B

Bougarel, X. (2007). Bosnian Islam as ‘European Islam’: Limits and shifts of a concept. In A. Al- Azmeh & E. Fokas (Eds.), Islam in Europe: Diversity, Identity and Influence (pp. 96-124). Cambridge University Press. https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00706262v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809309.007

Dobbelaere, K. (2002). Secularization: An Analysis at Three Levels. P.I.E.-Peter Lang. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1044191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0352-6146-2

Froese, P. (2004). After atheism: An analysis of religious monopolies in the post-communist world. Sociology of Religion, 65(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3712507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3712507

Hodžić, J. (2020). Političke partije nacionalnih manjina u Srbiji 1990–2020. In S. Orlović & D. Kovačević (Eds.), Zbornik radova sa naučne konferencije Trideset godina obnovljenog višepartizma u Srbiji (pp. 283-308). Fakultet političkih nauka. https://politikolog.rs/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Trideset-godina-obnovljenog-visepartizma-u-Srbiji-pdfa.pdf

Hodžić, J. (2024). Društvene i političke podele i rascepi Bošnjaka u Bosni i Hercegovini, Srbiji i Crnoj Gori - uporedna analiza. [Doktorska Disertacija, Univerzitet U Beogradu]. https://www.fpn.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/Jasmin_Hodzic_Disertacija_FPN.pdf

Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution. Princeton University Press.

Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generation. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 276-322). Routledge.

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791017

Perica, V. (2002). Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195148568.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195148568.001.0001

Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. University of California Press. https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/9p290982g

Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1980). Towards a theory of religion: Religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 19(2), 114-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1386246

Wimmer, A. (2008). The Making and Unmaking of Ethnic Boundaries: A Multilevel Process Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 970-1022. https://doi.org/10.1086/522803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/522803

Zrinščak, S. (2004). Generations and Atheism: Patterns of Response to Communist Rule among Different Generations and Countries. Social Compass, 51(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768604043008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768604043008

Zuber, C. I. (2011). Beyond outbidding? Ethnic party strategies in Serbia. Party Politics, 19(5), 758-777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811410368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811410368