Gender differences in cohort fertility patterns in Serbia: the role of educational gradient

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Aug 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.627
Keywords:
cohort fertility, 2022 census, parity progression, education, gender

Main Article Content

Vladimir Nikitović
Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research, Belgrade (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1840-9309
Ivana Magdalenić
Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research, Belgrade (Serbia)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-6742

Abstract

This paper represents the first contribution to the research of gender differences in the cohort fertility patterns in Serbia. We used the specially processed results of the 2022 Census that include one-year cohorts of women and men born in the 1940-1982 and 1940-1977 periods, respectively. Using parity progression rates, we examined the changes and gender patterns of completed cohort fertility from the perspective of educational differentials given the role of educational expansion in fertility changes in recent decades. Decomposition analysis showed that a marked increase in childlessness and the declining progression to second birth across cohorts born after 1960 is the key reason of the decline in completed fertility of both sexes. The development of the relationship between the education and fertility led to the changes in the educational differentials in fertility of both sexes, but also to a very pronounced gender gap in the patterns of these differentials. Convergence in completed fertility across different educational groups in the older cohorts of men turned to a divergence between the low-educated and the highly educated in the younger generations, resulting in a positive educational gradient in recent completed fertility of men. Negative educational gradient in completed fertility was observed across all cohorts of women, with the gap between the low- and highly educated doubled among the younger compared to the older cohorts. The development of educational differentials in childlessness across cohorts led to a gender convergence among the highly educated and divergence among the low-educated in Serbia, contrary to the process that took place in more gender egalitarian societies. The lack of convergence in the progression to second and third birth across different educational groups of both sexes, which is particularly pronounced among women, suggests that the more educated a person is, the more difficult it is for them to expand their family due to the lack of both institutional support for parenthood and gender equity within the family. The identified patterns of completed cohort fertility in Serbia confirm theoretical assumptions and findings from other countries that in the societies with more pronounced gender inequality and family support policies that are not sufficiently gender and parentally sensitive, higher opportunity costs of parenthood lead to lower fertility, and vice versa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nikitović, V., & Magdalenić, I. (2024). Gender differences in cohort fertility patterns in Serbia: the role of educational gradient. Stanovnistvo, 62(S1), S5-S35. https://doi.org/10.59954/stnv.627
Issue
Vol. 62 No. S1 (2024): Special issue: Current population issues in post-Yugoslav countries
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by the Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research 

Author Biographies

Vladimir Nikitović, Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research, Belgrade (Serbia)

Principal Research Fellow

Ivana Magdalenić, Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research, Belgrade (Serbia)

Research Assistant

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Andersson, G., Rønsen, M., Knudsen, L. B., Lappegård, T., Neyer, G., Skrede, K., … Vikat, A. (2009). Cohort fertility patterns in the Nordic countries. Demographic Research, 20, 313–352. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.14

Billari, F. C., Goisis, A., Liefbroer, A. C., Settersten, R. A., Aassve, A., Hagestad, G., & Spéder, Z. (2011). Social age deadlines for the childbearing of women and men. Human Reproduction, 26(3), 616–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq360

Bobić, M. (2018). Transition to Parenthood: New Insights Into Socio-Psychological Costs of Childbearing. Stanovnistvo, 56(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV180403003B DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV180403003B

Breznik, D. (1976). Natalitet i fertilitet stanovništva Jugoslavije. Stanovništvo, 14–15, 61–106.

Cekos in. (2006, January 4). Rešenje o cenzusima za dečiji dodatak od 04.01.2006. godine. https://www.cekos.rs/resenje-o-cenzusima-za-deciji-dodatak-od-04-01-2006-godine.

Čipin, I., Zeman, K., & Međimurec, P. (2020). Cohort Fertility, Parity Progression, and Family Size in Former Yugoslav Countries. Comparative Population Studies, 45, 229–264. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2020-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2020-18

Dudel, C., & Klüsener, S. (2016). Estimating male fertility in eastern and western Germany since 1991: A new lowest low? Demographic Research, 35, 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.53

Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing Family Demographics. Population and Development Review, 41(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x

Frejka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 2: Parity distribution and completed family size in Europe: Incipient decline of the two-child family model. Demographic Research, 19, 47–72. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.4

Frejka, T. (2017). The Fertility Transition Revisited: A Cohort Perspective. Comparative Population Studies, 42, 89–116. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2017-09

Frejka, T., & Gietel-Basten, S. (2016). Fertility and Family Policies in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990. Comparative Population Studies, 41(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2016-03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2016-03

Frejka, T., & Zakharov, S. (2013). The Apparent Failure of Russia’s Pronatalist Family Policies. Population and Development Review, 39(4), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00631.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00631.x

Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 207–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x

Jalovaara, M., Neyer, G., Andersson, G., Dahlberg, J., Dommermuth, L., Fallesen, P., & Lappegård, T. (2019). Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries. European Journal of Population, 35(3), 563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2

Keilman, N., Tymicki, K., & Skirbekk, V. (2014). Measures for Human Reproduction Should Be Linked to Both Men and Women. International Journal of Population Research, 2014, e908385. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/908385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/908385

Kravdal, Ø., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2008). Changing Relationships between Education and Fertility: A Study of Women and Men Born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 854–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300508

Lakomý, M. (2018). The role of values and of socioeconomic status in the education-fertility link among men and women. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 2017, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s121

Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x

Lukić, V., Marinković, I., Nikitović, V., Ostojić, I., Penev, G., Predojević-Despić, J., … Zvezdanović, J. (2013). Dynamic Historical Analysis of Longer Term Migratory, Labour Market and Human Capital Processes in Serbia (Country report developed within the project ‘SEEMIG Managing Migration and Its Effects – Transnational Actions Towards Evidence Based Strategies’). Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences. https://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/seemig/outputs/SEEMIGHistoricalAnalysisSerbia.pdf

Magdalenić, I., & Vojković, G. (2015). Promene u starosnom modelu rađanja u Srbiji i zemljama EU – komparativna analiza. Stanovnistvo, 53(2), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV1502043M DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV1502043M

Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria). (n.d.). Human Fertility Database. www.humanfertility.org

Merz, E.-M., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2018). Cross-national differences in the association between educational attainment and completed fertility. Do welfare regimes matter? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 1, 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s095

Ministarstvo za brigu o porodici i demografiju. (2024, June 19). Roditeljski dodatak. Ministarstvo za brigu o porodici i demografiju. https://www.minbpd.gov.rs/roditeljski-dodatak/.

Miric, N. (2018). Increase in the completed cohort fertility of high-educated women - a focus in the creation of population policy in Serbia. Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, (167), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1867409M DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1867409M

Miric, N. (2019). Difference in fertility between women with and without tertiary education in Serbia. Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, (170), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1970245M DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1970245M

Nikitović, V. (2011). Functional Data Analysis in Forecasting Serbian Fertility. Stanovništvo, 49(2), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV1102073N DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV1102073N

Nikitović, V. (2016). Dugoročne demografske implikacije niskog fertiliteta u regionu bivše Jugoslavije. Stanovništvo, 54(2), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV161115009N DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV161115009N

Nikitović, V., Arsenović, D., Sekulić, A., & Bajat, B. (2019). Is the Second Demographic Transition a useful framework for understanding the spatial patterns of fertility change in Serbia at the beginning of the 21st century? AUC Geographica, 54(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2019.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2019.14

Nikitovic, V., Buturovic, Z., & Ignjatovic, S. (2018). The effects of happiness on further childbearing plans among college educated mothers with one child. Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, (167), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1867421N DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1867421N

Rašević, Mirjana. (2004). Fertility Trends in Serbia during the 1990s. Stanovnistvo, 42(1–4), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV0404007R DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/STNV0404007R

Rašević, Mirjana, & Galjak, M. (2022). Demographic Challenges in Serbia. In E. Manić, V. Nikitović, & P. Djurović (Eds.), The Geography of Serbia: Nature, People, Economy (143–155). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74701-5_11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74701-5_11

Rašević, Mirjana, & Vasić, P. (2017). Obrazovanje kao faktor fertiliteta i populacione politike u Srbiji. Annales : anali za istrske in mediteranske študije = annali di Studi istriani e mediterranei = annals for Istrian and Mediterranean studies. Series historia et sociologia, 27(3), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.19233/ASHS.2017.42

Rašević, Miroslav. (1971). Uticaj obrazovanja na fertilitet i kontrolu rađanja. Stanovništvo, 9(3–4), 254–265.

Rendall, M. S., Clarke, L., Peters, H. E., Ranjit, N., & Verropoulou, G. (1999). Incomplete reporting of men’s fertility in the united states and britain: A research note. Demography, 36(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2648139

Schoumaker, B. (2019). Male Fertility Around the World and Over Time: How Different is it from Female Fertility? Population and Development Review, 45(3), 459–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12273

Sentić, M., & Breznik, D. (1978). Demografske promene u braku i porodici i neke njihove socijalne promene. Stanovništvo, 16(1–4), 78–94.

Sobotka, T. (2008). Overview Chapter 6: The diverse faces of the Second Demographic Transition in Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 171–224. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8

Sobotka, T., Beaujouan, É., & Van Bavel, J. (2017). Introduction: education and fertility in low-fertility settings. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2017s001

Stanojević, D. (2022). Addressing the Depopulation Challenge from the Family Life Perspective – Is Fertility Rise Possible? In D. Vuković (Ed.), National Human Development Report - Serbia 2022: Human Development in Response to Demographic Change (73–96). Belgrade: UNDP Serbia. https://hdr.undp.org.rs/chapter-3/index.html. Accessed 25 April 2024

Stropnik, N., & Šircelj, M. (2008). Slovenia: Generous family policy without evidence of any fertility impact. Demographic Research, 19, 1019–1058. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.26

Tomanovic, S. (2012). Changes in transition to adulthood of young people in Serbia between 2003 and 2011. Sociologija, 54(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1202227T DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1202227T

Vasić, P., Gligorijević, V., & Devedžić, M. (2014). Responding to population policy - which women can provide the greatest demographic benefit in Serbia? Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, (148), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1448541V DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/ZMSDN1448541V

Wood, J., Neels, K., & Kil, T. (2014). The educational gradient of childlessness and cohort parity progression in 14 low fertility countries. Demographic Research, 31, 1365–1416. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.31.46

Zeman, K., Beaujouan, E., Brzozowska, Z., & Sobotka, T. (2018). Cohort fertility decline in low fertility countries: Decomposition using parity progression ratios. Demographic Research, 38, 651–690. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.25