Bioethical and social constructions of life extension and longevity
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explores life span extension and longevity as one aspect of life course, focusing on the bioethical and social implications of the rise of longevity in modern societies. We juxtaposed Potter's categorisation of types of survival with the opposing views about life extension. This ethical and ideological contrast is especially pronounced when it comes to human enhancement, which improves human capacities and functioning above and beyond the statistical norm of human health. In the medium and long term, these interventions would change not only the human species, but also social roles and relationships. The crux of social and bioethical concern could be expressed through the questions: from what age do we start extending human life, and for whom? Does the extension of life lead to the re-establishment of our social roles from youth, or is it just a romantic image of our previous life stage? This study concludes that both paternalistic approaches to life extension and those avoiding modern medical treatments of diseases related to aging are faced with similar epistemological and social reductionism.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Published by the Institute of Social Sciences - Center for Demographic Research
References
Agar, N. (2002). The problem with nature. The Hastings Center Report, 32(6), 39–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/3528132
Agar, N. (2004). Liberal Eugenics–In Defence of Human Enhancement. Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
Alwin, D. F. (2011). Scholarly Foreword. In R. A. Settersten & J. L. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of Sociology of Aging (pp. v-vii). New York: Springer.
Bostrom, N. (2002). Existential Risks. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 9(1), 1-31.
CLONAID (2022). CLONAID: Pioneers in human cloning. Retrived from https://www.clonaid.com/
Crews, E. D. (1993). Biological Anthropology and Human Aging. Some Current Direction in Aging Research. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22, 395-423. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2155854
Dworkin, G. (2020). "Paternalism". In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/paternalism
Ehni, H-J., & Marckman, G. (2008). The Normative Dimensions of Extending the Human Lifespan by Age-Related Biomedical Innovations. Rejuvenation Research 11(5), 965–969. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2008.0749
Elliott, C. (1998). What's wrong with enhancement technologies? CHIPS Public Lecture. University of Minnesota, February 26, Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucbtdag/bioethics/writings/Elliott.html
Elliott, C. (2002). The importance of being human? The Hastings Center Report, 32(6), 42–45.
Elliott, C. (2007). The Tyranny of Expertise. In L. A. Eckenwiler & F. G. Cohn (Eds.), The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape (pp. 43-46). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fukujama, F. (2003). Naša posthumna budućnost: posledice biotehnološke revolucije. Podgorica: CID.
Garnett, P. G. (2021). Reductions in HIV incidence are likely to increase the importance of key population programmes for HIV control in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 24(S3), e25727. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25727
Gordijn, B. (2005). Nanoethics: From Utopian Dreams and Apocalyptic Nightmares towards a more Balanced View. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 521– 533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0024-1
Harris, J. (2004). Immortal ethics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1019(1), 527-534. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1297.098
Harris, J. (2007). Enhancing Evolution – The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Prinston: University Press.
Jecker, N. S. (2022). Too old to save? COVID‐19 and age‐based allocation of lifesaving medical care. Bioethics, 36(7), 802-808. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13041
Juengst, E. T., Binstock, R. H., Mehlman, M., Post, S. G., & Whitehouse, P. (2003). Biogerontology, “Anti-Aging Medicine,” and the Challenges of Human Enhancement. The Hastings Center Report, 33(4), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/3528377
Kass, R. L. (2000). The moral meaning of genetic technology. Human Life Review, 26(1), 76–87. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/517120
Kass, R. L. (2001). Preventing a brave new world. Human Life Review, 27(3), 14–35.
Lin, H-Y., & Day, T-H. D. ( 2014). A Study of Aging Topic Focusing On The Catholic Social Doctrine And A Sen's Capability Approach. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 13(37), 125-147.
Lindsay, A. R. (2005). Enhancements and justice: problems in determining the requirements of justice in genetically transformed society. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 15(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2005.0004
Mitrović, V. (2012). Iskorak bioetike: Nove bioetehnologije i društveni aspekti „poboljšanja“ zdravih. Beograd: ISI and Čigoja.
Mitrović, V. (2014). The Contingency of the "Enhancement" Arguments: The Possible Transition from Ethical Debate to Social and Political Programs. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 13(37), 93-124. http://jsri.ro/ojs/index.php/jsri/article/view/725
Omotoso, O., Gladyshev, V. N., & Zhou, X. (2001). Lifespan Extension in Long-Lived Vertebrates Rooted in Ecological Adaptation. Front Cell Dev Biol, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.704966
Parens, E. (1998). Special Supplement: Is Better Always Good? The Enhancement Project. The Hastings Center Report, 28(1), S1-S17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3527981
Pijnenburg, M. A. M., & Leget C. (2006). Who wants to live forever? Three arguments against extending the human life span. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(10), 585–587. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.017822
Post, G. S. (2007). The Aging Society and the Expansion of Senility: Biotechnological and Treatment Goals. In B. Steinbock (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics (pp. 304–324). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: Bridge to the Future. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Potter, V. R. (1988). Global Bioethics – Building on the Leopold Legacy. Michigan: Michigan State University Press.
Potter, V. R., & Potter, L. (2001) Global Bioethics: Converting Sustainable Development to Global Survival. Global Bioethics, 14(4), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2001.10800809
President Council on Bioethics (2003). Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. New York: Georgtown University Press.
Rosow, I. (1985). Status and Role Change through the Life Span. In H. R. Binnstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Science (pp. 457–482). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Savulescu, J. (2007). Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Being. In B. Steinbock (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics (pp. 516–536). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Shanas, E., & Maddox, G. (1985). Aging Health, and the Organization of Health resources. In H. R. Binnstock & E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Science (pp. 592–618). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Sidel, W. V., Gould, R.M., & Cohen, H.W. (2002). Bioterrorism Preparedness: Cooptation of Public Health. Medicine and Global Survival, 7(2), 82–89.
Silverstein, M., & Giarrusso, R. (2011). Aging Individuals, Families, and Societies: Micro–Meso–Macro Linkages in the Life Course. In R. A. Settersten & J. L. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of Sociology of Aging (pp. 35-49). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7374-0_3
Stock, G., & Callahan, D. (2007). Debate: The Ethics of Life Extension. Rejuvenation Research, 10(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2007.0599
Tian, X., Seluanov, A., & Gorbunova, V. (2017). Molecular Mechanisms Determining Lifespan in Short- and Long-Lived Species. Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM, 28(10), 722–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2017.07.004
Vaupel, J. W., Villavicencio, F., & Bergeron-Boucher, M-P. (2021). Demographic perspectives on the rise of longevity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2019536118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019536118